Jury Finds 2013 Porsche 911 to Be a “Lemon” and Orders Monetary Damages to Vehicle’s Owner
WEST PALM BEACH, FL--(Marketwired - Aug 20, 2015) - A Palm Beach County jury found that Porsche Cars North America, Inc. breached its written warranty...
WEST PALM BEACH, FL--(Marketwired - Aug 20, 2015) - A Palm Beach County jury found that Porsche Cars North America, Inc. breached its written warranty...
A Louisiana resident, Phremo Coleman, filed a lawsuit against Ford Motor Company claiming that the manufacturer failed t...
On January 16, 2015 after a 3 day jury trial, a verdict was delivered in favor of Eckerty, Indiana residents, David and Linda Ingle, against Ford Moto...
Scott M. Cohen of Krohn & Moss, Ltd. Consumer Law Center® has been selected to the 2015 Illinois Super Lawyers list. Each year, no more than five...
Each state varies when it comes to determining if a vehicle is a lemon. However, there are general guidelines that let consumers know if they need to ...
Lemon laws are designed to protect consumers from struggling with a defective vehicle. If your vehicle qualifies for relief under either state or fede...
Within the last week, General Motors, Hyundai, Mitsubishi and Suzuki ordered the recall of approximately 1.75 million vehicles, model years 2001 throu...
Honda Motor Company has recalled 2.9 million more vehicles with potentially explosive air bags. In total, Honda has recalled about 10.5 million ...
Toyota Motor Corp. was ordered to pay $3 million in an Oklahoma case claiming a defect in a Camry caused the vehicle to unintentionally accelerate, le...
In order for you to see our client video or read our client statements, please click the green button below. You will be taken directly to the video or client statements.
If you are interested in viewing information about the lawyer/firm’s past results and testimonials about the lawyer/firm, please read and acknowledge the information below.
The information in this section contains information about the lawyer/firm’s past results, testimonials about the lawyer/firm, and statements regarding the lawyer/firm’s quality. The information has not been reviewed or approved by Bar Associations of the states in which the law firm practices.
The facts and circumstances of your case may differ from the matters in which results and testimonials have been provided.
All results of cases handled by the lawyer/firm are not provided and not all clients have given testimonials.
The results and testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of results obtained by the lawyer/firm or of the experience of all clients or others with the lawyer/firm. Past results are no guarantee of future results. Every case is different, and each client’s case must be evaluated and handled on its own merits.
The testimonials or endorsements do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.